I hate the direction Gnome has taken where almost everything about the UI gets thrown out and re-written every few years, with features that I use simply disappearing. I, as someone using and programming computers for upwards of 40 years now feel that software is getting harder to use: it is less and less consistent while features are more and more difficult to discover. There is a point at which usability is not about the specific interface, but that it's about applications and the OS being consistent. The only reason they no longer do is because tablets are simply a much more convenient form factor to do virtually everything they need to do on a daily basis. My parents used a Linux desktop for years in the late '90s and '00s, mostly because it was substantially easier for me to help provide support for. If anything, Linux and the BSD have never struggled from unsolvable usability or compatibility issues, provided the hardware was chosen carefully, they struggled because they are free, are installable on commodity hardware already sold with other OS and thus aren't taken seriously. While if you are just a format + reinstall away from windows you will just not have the patience to dedicate the time to discover the UI, shortcuts and softwares to achieve the same thing but with a slightly different workflow. The difference is you seallow it easily because you actually bought a freaking expensive equipment and feel forced to get used to it. Most people are struggling a bit when switching to MacOS, I sure do as well. Most people used to amiga or atari suffured when they had to learn windows. Resistance to change is the main deterrent to people. When she asked how to do things, she didn't have any preconceptions. The difference with my grandmother and most average people is she hasn't been forced through school and work to the windows or mac ecosystem. And it sucks at a fraction of other ones but windows and macos do too suck big times at other things. Linux works for myriad of usecases the same way that windows and macos do. Have at you: be you artist or manufacturer? Have at you whatever promised fiefdom the FAANG (or is it MANGA) might, of its own beneficence carve out for you. If, on the other hand, you are saying you are owed some factory for your blind impress to stamp out mercantile - here we part company. The artistic and idealistic in a single 4th trumpet tone. ![]() ![]() Ives decided to earn his filthy lucre in insurance so that he could write a symphony (the rehearsal of which was hired out to the BSO) in which the 4th trumpet had but one note to play. de rerum natura), and to them I give my eternal thanks.Īs a photographer, perhaps you can empathize with the likes of Edgard Varèse or Charles Ives. But that is mediated by my understanding of "the way", which was informed by the myriad practitioners eager to spill the secrets of how things really work (i.e. Yet, I am split in my older, enervated state, I simply want my tools to get the fuck out of my way. Were I a truth-sayer, dawn's light would once more meet your eyes. GlenTheMachine, I responded to you because what you said struck a chord in me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |